46: good presentation the first one really didn't explain about his life in the camps.50: very good and interesting
48 very good info and good knowledge of each person50 creativew, good info
48Organized clearly 45Lots of information, video was interesting
Criteria 1, 44 savanna could've told more about her person like last known placeCriteria 2, 40 not that creative in the power point.
They organized there information very well. 45 pointsCreativity could have been better. 40 points
Criteria 1: 50 they had all their informationCriteria 2: 47 they were creative but then again they wasn't.
C1: 46 they had great information. Although they read from the PowerPoint most of the time.C2: 45 they had plenty of pictures . That's good. But they could of put forth more effort.
1. 40. Thought that it was very Thought out. What was said could have been more interpreted on how their lives were changed, did not look like anyone in the group had a clear understand of what was needed to be said.2. 40 creativity was no all that impressive did like how y'all added in a was very good.
Courtney didn't seem all that into her person. She mostly read off the screen... The others were very intelligent. 45-Could have a little more information. 40- Powerpoint and video idea is kind of overused. Eighty-five. (;
Very good, very good indeed, skcus annavas, good and descriptive.
40% the project was entertaining but the speeches were hard to understand. 40% PowerPoint is not creativity
Criteria 1 48This was a great presentation, and very affective towards my knowledge about the holocaust.Criteria 2 45The people in the group were very effective.